Tuesday, May 31, 2011
Tedashii--Blacklight
Monday, May 30, 2011
Sunday, May 29, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Jovan Mackenzy (Pt. 3)
Saturday, May 28, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Jovan Mackenzy (Pt. 2)
Friday, May 27, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Jovan Mackenzy
Thursday, May 26, 2011
Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Tuesday, May 24, 2011
Monday, May 23, 2011
Still... Catching Up (Back to the Blog Pt. 2...)
Sunday, May 22, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Flame (Pt. 3)
Saturday, May 21, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Flame (Pt. 2)
Friday, May 20, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Flame
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Wednesday, May 18, 2011
Tuesday, May 17, 2011
Monday, May 16, 2011
Biblical Manhood
Sunday, May 15, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Lecrae (Pt. 3)
Saturday, May 14, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Lecrae (Pt. 2)
Friday, May 13, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Lecrae
Thursday, May 12, 2011
"But God..."
Wednesday, May 11, 2011
How To Love Your Wife
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Up and Out, Not In
Monday, May 9, 2011
Inerrancy
Biblical inerrancy is a hotly debated topic within the Christian church. Some claim that the Bible may be inerrant only pertaining to matters of “faith and practice”[1] Others claim that the Bible need not be inerrant at all—because the Bible was written by fallible men, it must contain errors in certain matters. Finally, there are those who claim that the Bible is completely inerrant, as it pertains to the original documents written. This is the position to which I would subscribe. I believe that the Bible, as it pertains to the original manuscripts, is without error as it relates to all matters of life—not simply to “faith matters.” The Bible is the Word of God, “breathed out by God,” according to 2 Timothy 3:16. Peter says that, “no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit.” (2 Peter 1:20-21 ESV) If God’s character is that of truth, as Jesus says in John 17:17, “your word is truth,” (ESV) then the Words which would be “breathed out by God” could not be false. God’s Word cannot be untruthful in any matter, because God is unchangingly truthful. P.D. Feinberg notes, “In John 10:34-35 Jesus says that Scripture cannot be broken and so is absolutely binding. While it is true that both passages emphasize the Bible’s authority, this authority can only be justified by or grounded in inerrancy. Something that contains errors cannot be absolutely authoritative.”[2] The Word of God is without error because God’s character is without error, and cannot change. The matters which may appear to be false about the Bible will inevitably be shown to be true, given enough time. This has been shown throughout history, both scientifically and archaeologically. Men may misinterpret the Word of God as being false, but the Bible itself never speaks falsely, and can be trusted in matters concerning every area of life, not just “faith and practice.” I am further convinced (although not as authoritatively) by the historical argument for inerrancy. If the Christian church has been convinced of the inerrancy of the Bible since the earliest days of the Church (as evidenced by Augustine) and throughout its history (as evidenced by Calvin and Luther), then it seems rather arrogant to assume that the 20th and 21st century church would suddenly discover contradictions and errors that brilliant men of the past (i.e. Augustine, Aquinas, Calvin, Edwards) had not already thought through. This doctrine has been taught implicitly throughout church history, and should be defended in the modern context explicitly and voraciously.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Trip Lee (Pt. 3)
Saturday, May 7, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Trip Lee (Pt. 2)
Friday, May 6, 2011
Hip-Hop Weekend--Trip Lee
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Managing Time
Wednesday, May 4, 2011
Different Ways to Study Theology
Systematic theology, as defined by B.A. Demarest, “begins with the totality of biblical revelation and extra-biblical truth, provisionally respects the development of doctrine in the church’s history, draws out the teachings of Scripture via sound grammatical, historical, and cultural exegesis, orders the result into a coherent whole where the interrelatedness of its parts is evidenced, and relates the results to the life and witness of the Christian community.” (Elwell, 1162) The study of systematic theology takes a look through Scripture as a whole, and picks out (via proper exegesis) verses which apply to specific major doctrines within Scripture. These include Scripture, the Doctrine of God, Man, Sin, Christ, Salvation, the Church, and Last things. (Erickson, 24) These studies can relate to other means of theological study in different ways.
In Biblical theology, the Scripture passages themselves are drawn out via the text. When exegeted correctly, Systematic theology and Biblical theology can be very similar. As Erickson notes, “systematic theology of the right kind will be biblical theology.” (26) Systematic theology drawn out from the text of Scripture, therefore, will relate very easily to Biblical theology concepts.
In historical theology, doctrine is studied through looking at both Church history and various theologians within Church history (i.e. Calvin, Luther, Augustine). Systematic theology can also be understood to be similar to historical theology. Systematic theology deals with specific Biblical doctrines, and historical theology takes a look at how these doctrines have been handled throughout the history of Christianity and by various theologians.
Philosophical theology does much to inform systematic theology. It can inform theology by providing the substance of theology, defending theological arguments, and looking critically at the ideas and arguments for theological positions. (Erickson, 29) While philosophy should not be used as a judge standing over theology, it can be a valuable resource when it comes to establishing the truthfulness of theological statements and concepts.
Personally, I think that systematic theology is the most important type of theology. I think that systematic theology sets forth Biblical truth through a very coherent system of thought which deals with all of the major Bible doctrines—and several other minor ones by implication. In the future, I think I will mainly stick with this form of theology, because it allows me to judge each text by the Bible as a whole. I would certainly be interested, however, in seeing how each of these other types of theology applies to studying specific Bible passages.